INTERNAL INTERREGIONAL
COOPERATION PROJECTS

(Article 10 of the statutes for European funds for regional development)

1 - THE RECITE EXPERIENCE 1990-1995 :
The widespread of a cooperative culture
In 1990 the European Commission launched 15 experimental projects which came into being in 1991. After reviewing the findings of these undertakings, a call for proposals was made at the end of 1991 for the creation of the programme RECITE. The activities undertaken by the 21 selected organizations began in 1992. Between 1991 and 1996 the RECITE programme, with the aid of over 48 million euros, was able to create 36 interregional cooperative institutions.

The results dating from the period 1991-1996 show a true widespread of cooperative culture. At the same time these findings contribute most specifically to :

  • the sharing of common experiences by European participants of diverse backgrounds.
  • the reinforcement of economic and social cohesion, through the participation of local actors from disadvantaged cities and regions in future or existing cooperation networks.
  • the development of a sense of European identity in local authorities.

In conclusion, these undertakings constitute an important factor in the realm of European integration. Moreover, the experience served to define the framework for the setting up of new community ventures such as the call for proposal to create RECITE II (1997-2001) established in October 1996 and running through to May 15 1997.

2 - THE RECITE Il PROGRAMME (1997- 2001) :
The development of interregional cooperation

The objectives of the RECITE programme fall within the general plan adopted for the second programming period of Article 10 of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (1995-1999).

Unlike RECITE I, the RECITE II call to proposal emphasizes the transfer
of expertise through the achievement of concrete initiatives in the field
of development. In comparison with the preceding period, improvement is centred around the contents as well as the administrative organization of the projects. The principal points are as follows :

  • a more accurate definition of measurable concrete achievements (implying that the projects received more substantial financial aid).
  • a more systematic encouragement from both the private and the public (the proposal stipulates explicitly "that priority be given to regionally initiated projects in close association with the economic and/or social players in each of the concerned areas").
  • a reinforcement of the organization, follow-ups as well as an ongoing evaluation of the projects.
  • a greater openness and a better distribution of responsibilities according to the principles of decentralized management.

Return to the top of the page

To main page ...